RolStoppable said:
And there it is. It's all about your personal desire to have more powerful Nintendo hardware, regardless of what it means for their business. |
Yes ... and?
I'm in this to play games (go figure). Sales trends are interesting to watch, but they don't super-cede the actual games themselves for me. I'm pretty sure that is true of most posters here too.
Anything that makes the game experience better for me as the gamer is something I'm going to want. What in the world is so crazy about that? lol.
Would anyone want to play Mario Galaxy on the N64? Or Mario 64 on the SNES with Super FX chip? Or Breath of the Wild on the Wii? Outside of curiosity sake, no because it would be terrible. The games would have to be compromised in a negative way. Generational leaps have always been good for game experiences, they open the door to things that wouldn't be possible on previous platforms.
There is nothing inherently wrong business wise with changing generations to better hardware either, Sony seems to manage just fine with the home console Playstations (aside from PS3 where they did make bad design decisions early on and paid the price for it), it's only a headache for Nintendo because they choose quite often with hardware transitions to make stupid decisions the market doesn't like. But that's not the fault of the hardware getting better. Stop doing stupid things and you'll have better hardware transitions, simple as that.
Advance Wars is one of my favorite IP, I could give exactly zero fucks that it doesn't sell anywhere close to something else. I don't base what music I like on album sales or TV shows I watch based on TV ratings, following industry trends is fine, but when it gets to "well you should be cheerleading for crappier experiences for yourself because of sales figures" ... yeah no thanks. That's where the bus is headed to crazy land and I'll get off at this stop, thank you very much lol.







