GoOnKid said:
1) Yes I have a microSD card in my Switch which cost a fortune. This is dumb. I would have bought all games physical but sadly a whole lot of them don't have a physical edition so I'm forced to download them. Some have DLC which also take up digital space. However, I didn't need to buy furniture for my games. Of course I have shelves, cupboards and stuff but there are all kinds of things inside them. I bought these furniture to store anything inside them, not just games. So no, I never bought shelves just for games. 2) This is ridiculous and we should not discuss this any further. Not only is this "a little inconvenient", it's plain dumb. Here, have some convenience instead: |
1) Initially you said you own a lot of games so I assumed that you, as a physical collector, have some shelves filled with them. Doesn't really matter though if they're just partially filled and you never intended to buy furniture for gaming. Fact is that you're using them for that purpose, so if you bought a cupboard that is 30% filled with games, 30% of the cost of that cupboard is used up by storing games. I mean according to your logic it would be fine for me to say that storing digital games doesn't cost anything since you can just use an old HDD or microSD that was bought and intended to store something else and just repurpose it for storing digital games.
Also blame Nintendo if they don't let you store games on the cheapest available storage devices. You make it out to be a universal problem with digital gaming but in fact it's a Nintendo exclusive problem.
2) You asked me to name a solution to a lack of a second hand market and I did. Not the most elegant way of doing it but it works and it's being done. I could ask you to find a solution to playing the same game on two devices simultaneously without buying it twice. It's possible with any game using digital game sharing.