By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

And the hits keep coming:

So basically, AH illegally smuggled her dogs into Australia knowing not only could she face jail time, but the dogs could be put down. The Australian authorities even told her this, and she was like "I don't care" and brought them in (illegally), anyway and perjured herself in doing so by lying about it.

And still, it gets worse: the only reason they weren't put down is because Johnny actually went down and got the dogs OUT of there via private flight, and AH is later chewing him out for saving her dogs' ass.

Wow, this woman is an absolute monster, and I don't say that blindly. I sided with Rhiannah and all of Weinstein's and Cosby's accusers, and believed O.J. did it, and I'll never support anything Roman Polanski does except from the inside of a prison cell, and I thought Greg Hardy was guilty as sin before those undoctored (that's kinda an important detail) bruise photos were made public (here's why). Not this time unless and until somebody can explain to me how AH can be vigorously punched in the face with metal rings, choked, SAed, hair-pulled, phone thrown in her face, etc., left with black eyes, a broken nose and a busted lip and be seen without a single scratch on her face (or anywhere) the very next day, which I have yet to get an affirmative answer for. Why do I think I won't get it?

P.S., most defamation trials don't have the defendant leaving a paper trail this fucking big spelling out in big bold rainbow letters their intent to defame on top of admitting to the things they accuse (read: defame) their victim of. This lawyer thinks her Op Ed is fair (lawsuit) game BTW, "vague" or no.

Last edited by KManX89 - on 14 May 2022