By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KManX89 on 11 May 2022
Edit Thread
JWeinCom said:
KManX89 said:

"Vagueness" is irrelevant. Amber DID intend to namedrop JD in the WP Op-Ed and all available evidence clearly points to it being about JD in any event. Was there anyone else she filed fake TROs against in 2016? No, and I'd hardly call someone recording the plaintiff (in this case, JD) at their weakest and concocting a Gone Girl scheme to try to throw shit on them as not having malicious intent for writing an Op-Ed detailing their "abuse", especially when she conveniently planned it to coincide with Aqua Man's release. Hell, is it just me, or did Amber literally say she plans to paint fake bruises with makeup, take pictures with friends and show them to the authorities because "no one will believe Johnny"?:

For fuck's sake, I already said multiple times that the fact that she didn't name him likely doesn't matter. XD Why are you so intent on trying to make me defend a position I don't hold? It's so bizarre that you're vommiting the same stuff at me again. Are you like a bot or something? 

Then why even bring it up? Everyone knew it was about Johnny, which is why he was lambasted by the media for years and he lost out on movie roles, including his most prominent one. It doesn't matter that it doesn't mention him by name or she had a screw loose (which is common knowledge at this point), Amber has no leg to stand on because all the evidence overwhelmingly points to her abusing AND defaming him and her knowing exactly what she was doing, hence the laughing at the end of one such recording (and I think you know what I'm talking about).

Oh, and once again speaking of her story not adding up, Amber was caught in yet another hole in her constantly-changing timeline (read: lie):