By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EricHiggin on 27 October 2021
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
EricHiggin said:

Well it was asked why? It doesn't have much to do with it, which is why I didn't focus on it. That's a separate point.

Them not having to make handhelds was part of the explanation. Along with how a Switch like device wouldn't be the same as past SNY handhelds where there were two separate platforms to deal with instead of one platform and multiple devices sharing games.

There are also plenty of games that haven't been ported, and games that seemingly should have been ported long ago, so why haven't they? Likely the same reason (partly) why SNY and MS haven't done a Switch. Just because you can or could, doesn't mean you will or should.

That still has nothing do to with what I posted. The only point of my post was the misconception that Switch is on par or even weaker than PS3/360.

Well maybe you're assuming that everyone thinks it's only about performance when that's not their thinking or just part of their reasoning.



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.