Hiku said:
You're linking to sites named Conservative News Media, that have headlines such as: "Sorry LIBS, but....", "left wing egg on their face", and reference Alex Jones input. Sound like very serious news organizations worth reading and responding to. But I will this once, to illustrate why you shouldn't. Rolling Stone did update their article with this story that one hospital in that state did not experience this. And they've reached out to other hospitals in the area that the doctor's group serves for comments. We can't say with certainty that this story is accurate until we hear something concrete, but we also can't say that it is fake because one hospital didn't experience this. So Oklahoma aside, Ivermectin overdoses is an actual problem that shouldn't be happening. Next time, please don't reference literal propaganda sites. Or I will just dismiss it referencing this post of yours, because I don't want to waste another 10 minutes of my life that I won't get back. I fully understand the skepticism towards mainstream media, but those kind of sites are not the alternative. There are independent news organizations that are not propaganda outlets. And Rolling Stone updated the article with this story, so you could have just linked to that. |
Like Rolling Stone(d) is any better? Just because their bias is hidden due to a random name doesn't mean they don't have one. The point is whether or not the subject matter is accurate and credible.
I shouldn't read and respond with them, but you should with Rolling Stone, even though you admit the story could be BS and we need to wait? Perhaps Rolling Stone should've done it's due diligence by waiting and further investigating, since it's such a 'mainstream upstanding' organization then, right?
So people can't get human Ivermectin, since it's being held back or is in short supply, and are turning to animal versions, which would require an adjustment to the dosage? Why isn't there a push to make sure human Ivermectin is plentiful since it clearly is for animals? Also, what constitutes exposure in the report?
Hopefully this link is legitimate enough for you. Here is the initial paragraph so you can decide if the rest is worth your time.
numberwang said:
Wait till you hear it's mostly POCs who are unvaxxed... https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/nyregion/covid-vaccine-black-young-new-yorkers.html |
With NY and it's strict vax pass push, POC would be kept form attending events and establishments that others could, correct?. Segregation that targets POC in this case seems kinda racist doesn't it?