Is Legacy content/backwards compatibility important for a console's success?

[javi741]

padib said:

Runa216 said:

So your reality is that of delusion, then? I mean, I can believe a tangerine is an orange all I want, that doesn't make it a fact. 

This argument of whether or not smash Ultimate is a port or a new game is stupid. you are wrong. Period. End of discussion. subjective opinions do not supercede objective facts. How is this still an argument? How are people so wrong so consistently? How are people still in denial/delusion over something so trivial? 

I just don't get how or why you cling to this, then try to mask your ignorance as an opinion. that's not how this works, dude. 

Yes my reality is a delusion and you are the master of truth. May Jesus Christ bless you for being so understanding and respectful of my point of view.

I am 100% certain that this particularly personable approach works well for you in life, and encourage you to carry on!

Why are you still acting like Smash Ultimate being a new game or not is an opinionated matter based off of perspective. This is not an opinionated matter, its fact that Smash Ultimate is a new game. It is not an opinion that should be accepted cause you're opinion is factually wrong. You could say Smash is not a new game all you want but the point is you'll always be wrong, so your perspective on Smash Ultimate holds zero weight when it comes to an argument based on facts.

Last edited by javi741 - on 26 April 2021