Mnementh said:
CarcharodonKraz said:
Nmh3 may not the best representation. Honeatly that and bayonetta are a tough call, but I am hopeful. BUT I am excited for it so I felt it would be somehow disingenuous of me not to mention it as a game u started the convo w. That being said, I dont think fall guys in on the same level as say witcher3. If I had to place nmh3 with 1 of those two games, its not going w fall guys. Im dont think im familiar enough w the others to comment. But it seems possible that ur too caught up on my use of the word "console". And I use it because I feel the switch is mismarketed as a hybrid. The switches games are fine for a handheld, and looking them as AAA makes more sense in that scope, but, more relevwnt to this topic, how the switch gonna handle cyberpunk when the the ps5 version drops? Its not, and itd be silly to expect that. What do u think the chances are that, if gollum releases this year, it releases on switch, with a physical version, AND tberes no download required and its not a buggy mess like outer worlds. How bout gotham knights (a good example of a game fitting the description that im NOT into). Side question, would it be more logical to compare subnautia wy time at portia? |
Side question: Why buy these games you mention on console at all? As you mention, even on PS5 you have an inferior experience compared to the PC. That's how I see it. PC is for the AAA-cookie cutter crap like Cyberpunk and AssCreed:Valhalla and so on. While Switch is perfect for the more unique gaming experiences. |
Preauming u were actually curious about said side question, I dont care for the inherent digital and online heavy market place that pcs come with. Also w my laptop every other time I open it up some background windows process slows it to a hault for like 20min. My ps4 does not. Theres a more streamline hassle free experience w a dedicated gaming device. And I got my ps4 for 300 bundled w a game. It almost doesnt seem worth it to jump into the pc world @ that pricepoint.
