EnricoPallazzo said:
Agree 100%. NZ deserves the kudos for handling the situation but we need keep those things in mind when people say "ZN did why cant we do the same?". It is a very different situation. Still I think government could have been more nefarious in dealing with the situation. I would much rather close the borders 100% and deny people entering and leaving the country to be able to have a life that is closer to "normal" and keep stores open and us being able to see family and friends, than live at least 2 years in this miserable situation. What happened after people came back from summer holidays was so predictable. What you said about 100 deaths per day, I believe vaccination will bring this number drastically down while contamination will still he high. Which brings me to my initial point which was considered by some as nonsense: - If we know the vast majority of the people that die are older than 70 and people in group risk, and this people is being vaccinated and the number of deaths will go down drastically, what would be the threshold for us to come back to normal? 10 deaths per day? 1? Maybe hospital capacity? - What about the people that refuse to take the vaccine (50% in France) still keeping the rates high? Are they still going to keep us locked because of it? - What about religious groups that still refuse to cancel their gatherings, keeping contamination and death rates high? Are they still going to keep us locked because of it? There needs to be a moment when government will tell us "now it is under your responsibility regarding your life, you are allowed to leave home now". And if you want to stay forever locked just do it. If you want to be part of a gangbang with strangers just do it. Want to go to a football game, just do it and you deal with the consequences. |
How would closing the borders 100% and keeping the stores open at the same time even work? What would they sell when truck drivers or ship crews can't pass the borders? After all, tons of wares are manufactured abroad.
How would you secure the borders of continental countries? You'd need to position a border guard every 100m or so in order to keep someone from entering or leaving. Many countries have border cities or villages where you can easily walk from one country to the other without even having to use roads. Just a short trip through a forest or a field and you're on the other side. Therefore for many countries you'd need tens of thousands of border guards. That's pretty much the reason why the GDR built a wall back in the days (and fences) to stop people from fleeing into West Germany.
Also you can't legally deny entry to your own citizens. No constitutional court would allow that.
And once the virus has spread enough in your country, closing the borders won't have a bif effect for your own country.
Last edited by Barozi - on 18 December 2020