By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EricHiggin on 18 December 2020
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
EricHiggin said:

Elon Musk would agree, yet disagree. It's not overcomplicating, it's taking as much as possible necessary into account to make it simpler.

No offense, but what you're doing seems to be more putting up as much smoke as possible to obscure what's actually not complicated at all.

No offence taken. I'm not a pyro and don't smoke. Makes life less complicated.

Rab said:
EricHiggin said:

Giving up much freedom to get freedom sooner cancels itself out, no different than giving up a little freedom and dealing with that for a while longer. How it will play out later on, which nobody knows, and how it will effect everything/everyone else, will be what gives a reasonable indication of who did what better.

Except the NZ/Australian freedoms are deeper and for everyone including for the old and health compromised, everyone is safer in this form of universal freedom, these countries truly believe the idea that with freedom comes responsibility, and it shows in practice to work beautifully 

"Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Ben Franklin disagrees.



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.