curl-6 said:
That doesn't at all disprove what I said. From the Spanish Flu to numerous outbreaks of serious disease throughout recent centuries, measures to prevent the spread of the pathogen within the population have been widely implemented, everything putting Smallpox victims in special hospitals or even ships, to marking the houses of plague victims and keeping them there. During the Spanish Flu, they took such measures as closing schools, theatres, and places of worship, limiting public transportation, and banning mass gatherings. Masks were also commonly worn. It's got nothing to do with authoritarianism. It's about reducing the toll of the disease. |
If that were true, the same protocols would always be instated with a severe enough illness. They aren't always, because some are more controlling than others, depending on their agenda.
I never said it had nothing to do with the illness, but a 'good' politician never let's a crisis go to 'waste'. Pretty sick when it comes to a deadly illness.