High profile twitter users hacked, Checkmarks locked to secure site.

[sundin13]

John2290 said:

Hynad said:

My bad. Yeah. Still, where should one draw the line?

If what someone says put people in danger, because they’re in a position of authority or they have an audience they can easily influence, that can easily fall in your “threatens to physically (and mentally, I will add) harm” category.

The line should be drawn where it has beem for years, in law and a super position decided by a judge or a jury once the line of physical harm seems to or clearly has been crossed on an individual basis and dealth with appropriately based on the individual case, context and circumstance along with other factors like the accused mental state. How is ot ao difficult to understand, we've done it pretty damn finely for decades now and we've never had to destroy a teenagers entire future or perhaps someone who has one bad day and ruin them for the rest of their lives because some words came out of their mouths. Once you silence enough people you create an opposition group abd beg for your own ideals and way of life to be torn down and built back up with the silenced point of view should they win, ask the Catholic church how their world domination went for them when they made people with alternate ideas go underground.

So, how do you believe sites like VGC should handle moderation?