scottslater said:
Yeah, I would view it that way about legs but it is a "subjective" topic overall. If you fall off of best selling charts within a couple weeks/months after release that can't be a good thing for overall sales (even more so when you take into count the amount that these games get discounted and bundled) and making money. I'm a Nintendo fan, but you provided some data and I provided data on what I think presents a better idea of what "legs" look like. Doesn't really make sense to expect Nintendo 1st party console games to consistently do well and not expect Sony titles to do the same with how much people like to say that the PS4 is successful because of their 1st party games... |
I would agree it is semi subjective as far as legs goes. So in saying that it means you could be right and others can be wrong and vice versa. Do you have any proof that says that if a game falls off the top selling charts in the first couple of weeks/months is always bad for a games overall sales and making money? Or is that just your personal thought?
That a big part of why the PS4 has been successful, because of Sony 1st party games. Which have been doing consistently well. So I guess I don't see where the issue is. This generation has been one of the biggest if not THE biggest for Sony 1st party games and their sales. To think other wise would mean one would think that almost all Sony 1st party games before this generation did not do well.
So I guess I am just at a loss to how you came to your stance.
The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...
PSN: StlUzumaki23