Hynad said:
EricHiggin said:
It's almost like people need to be clear about things they say and portray and explain them well, even in just the right way, for others to understand in a manner that they may agree with. It's almost like if you don't do that, people have no choice but to interpret what you put in front of them, in which they may see things differently to some degree, and may disagree with the intended meaning.
Why some can get away with poor etiquette by being vague, while others can't however, is still a mystery...
So just to be clear.
It would be like someone saying, based on the political sphere, 'As the people who would propagate this kind of hate would say, how stunning and brave! I hope these people get the mental help they so clearly need. Unfortunately this is now the cost of electing a populist entertainer that challenges conventions. Donald doesn't deserve any of this' ?
I didn't look at it that way, but now that you've explained it, maybe Neil has a point...
|
Seriously... You are trying too hard.
You want to argue for arguing’s sake, and I question your motive here.
It is quite clear for everyone other than you what Neil means by “this kind of hate”. So maybe question yourself before questioning him.
|
You're starting to sound a lot more like Neil.