dane007 said:
Otter said:
What looks betters, Halo 5 running at 4k on Xbox One X or the Unreal Engine 5 demo running at 1440p on PS5? ;)
There you have your answer. Xbox One X runs an Xbox One games at 4k, but it wouldn't be able to produce the PS5 tech demo. Ultimately developers have to choose where they put the consoles power. Without direct comparison, most people wouldn't be able to tell with the naked eye whether they're looking at a (Good) upscaled 4k (from 1440p) or a native 4k. Especially if we're talking about TVs and not computer moniters.
We will for sure see plenty of native 4k PS5/Xbox One games, but they won't be the most graphically impressive. Once the gen hits its stride I think we will see 1440(PS5) 1800p (XSX) as common targets. As upscalling gets better I'm sure more devs will more boldly go to 1080p to achieve stunning next gen visuals at 60fps.
|
I wouldn't use halo 5 as an amazing lookjng game lol. I would have use games such as red dead redemption which was native 4k and that game had stunning visuals. There was gears if war 5 which was native 4k and 60fps on xbox one x.. That game was quite stunning for current gen. Then you have far cry series that is native 4k on xbox one x. That game too looks amazing at 4k. If those games can be achieved on current gen with stunning visuals and at 4k, then i dont see why either next gen consoles can't do it with alot more power. I dont think we will ever see 1080p games next gen unless its one of the indie developers.
|
So you think the detail in Red Dead Redemption 2 or Gears is comparable to that UE5 demo?
