Ka-pi96 said:
You'd still be only you. The clone would be a completely different person. A clone would only have the same DNA as you, personality, memories, behaviour etc. could all vary massively. And yes, clones have always existed. For things that reproduce asexually clones are actually incredibly common. Plus, if you consider that there are a finite number of human DNA configurations, it's entirely possible that human clones have been naturally produced before, or will be at some point in the future. |
"You'd still be only you", 'except for the DNA part, which wouldn't only be you'... Could memories eventually be cloned?
Don't humans require male and female though?
| SpokenTruth said: Eric, you are reaching so hard to defend your perspective that you've suggested cloning dead people as a viable strategy to keep the economy open. |
Funny you bring that up now. You didn't seem to have much of a problem with it prior, before others decided to join the convo.
I suggested? Perspective?
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
