By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Immersiveunreality said:
Jaicee said:
If you look up this concept in the dictionary, the definition will read: "Cats".

Did see screenshots of it,not a movie i would watch alone. :p

It's definitely more fun with a group of like-minded people who are equally baffled. Preferably not sober.

It's impossible to follow the "plot" and there are so many just...truly bizarre scenes and obvious glitches in the computer animation, you really do have to wonder how it was that so many big-name celebrities never protested. Why are cats wearing fur coats? What train of thought led to the conclusion that "Taylor Swift as a hideous CGI trans-cat; YES, everyone will love this!"...? So...many...questions! Why? Why did no one have enough common sense to say no at some point? Why did none of these big-name celebs with reputations to uphold take a stand for their basic dignity?

Oh well. Whatever the intention behind Cats was, it was clearly sincere because there's not a single ounce of commercialism to be found. That makes me kinda sympathize with the filmmakers. They wanted to do something really special. They failed miserably, but hey, at least they tried!