JWeinCom said:
Unless he had some sort of valid reason to believe it might work, it's idiotic to even suggest doctors use their time looking into it. As far as I can tell, there was no such valid reason. His logic seems to be "this kills stuff on surfaces so why don't we put it inside people's bodies". That too is idiotic. If I had a disease, went to my doctor, saw the janitor cleaning the floor, and said "hey why don't we put some of that in my body?" I'm pretty sure people would call me idiot. |
SpokenTruth said:
Who in the hell even needs to ask this question? What kind of lack of common sense and minimal IQ level must you be at for this to be a valid question? Who knows? Damn near everybody but Trump. The President of the United States should not be the raison d'etre for warning labels on certain products. |
I wonder who thought up blasting the human body with radiation? Why would they think that? 'Obviously' that was ridiculous because of the harm it would do.
Good thing that thought was bashed, rejected, and squashed long ago before they eventually started curing people with that 'idiotic' idea, right?
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







