If the rumors for Lockhart are true, and it does have around a 4-5 TF Navi GPU and 6-8 core Ryzen CPU, then Lockhart alone could be said to be 4X more powerful than XB1X. That 4-5 TF Navi GPU would probably come close to matching the 6 TF XB1X Polaris GPU, so were they talking about Anaconda or Lockhart? You could still technically say 'it'll eat monsters for breakfast', since Lockhart would be considerably more capable than XB1X, just more so in terms of CPU.
Anaconda would not be 24TF, and if by some chance that were to be the case somehow, if most can agree that a 12 TF console would be around $500, then Anaconda would cost $1,000+. The Apple or Nvidia business model is not going to work for consoles anytime soon.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
