FishyJoe said:
The analysis is flawed because it has absolutely nothing to do with the original discussion, which was about the legs of games. All I did was point out that they weren't particularly impressive. I did not say they were bad, just not great. As for the Crazzyman reference, when you end every one of your arguments with a smiley, you're asking for it. Especially every one of your arguments has nothing to do with the original discussion. |
Wow ... excuse me for trying to use smileys to try and get rid of the tension that my post could cause ...
Oh , and about the discussion it actually had 2 lines : 1 was the sales of CC and the second was about the legs , so yeah , I tryed to take on both of them , maybe thats why it seemed that my post could be derivative ...
Vote the Mayor for Mayor!







