The_Liquid_Laser said:
This is a very good point. I believe "A Star Is Born" has been made 4 different times. Although they wait long enough between remakes that this latest one seems new to most people. |
Yeah. The wait between releases has to do with generations I think. I noticed a lot of remakes recently from stuff that was a thing then I was young: Jumanji, Baywatch, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turles, Miami Vice for instance. Some years ago there were remakes from stuff from before my time: Charlies Angels, The Avengers, Mission Impossible, Planet of the Apes. I think this is comparable to remakes of Links Awakening, Resident Evil 2 or Final Fantasy 7. Enough time has gone by that a lot of new gamers are there that never knew these games, while at the same time the older gamers still remember fondly.
In the gaming industry it is easier to justify remakes on a shorter cycle: by adding content with including DLC or adding new modes and stuff like that. In the movie industry the equivalent are director cuts.
zorg1000 said:
It also seems like the remake cycle gets smaller each time. For example, King Kong 1933, 1976, 2005, 2017. |
Well, the faster the cycle, the more money you potentially make. Until you overdo it and burn that IP through too much recycling.







