EricHiggin on 15 October 2018
Final-Fan said:
For a guy who wants to talk about the points you made, and not the video title, it's funny how the only part of my response to your points that you addressed was the part where I mentioned the video title.
If you truly think that "maybe he was laughing on the inside" is a reasonable defense of the fact that a video titled "Mitch McConnell LAUGHS At Hillary Clinton And Far Left Mob Over Brett Kavanaugh" shows zero laughter, especially when the video description backtracks to "Mitch McConnell Today smiled and smirked and made fun of all of the opposition", I really don't know what to say. Maybe you're in the Matrix and everything you do and experience is an illusion? Asking why I don't assume the video's poster meant he was laughing on the inside is about as silly.
And I realize you're trying to mock me with the third paragraph, but I STILL can't figure out what you're actually referring to as the basis for your mockery, as far as "apparently it's up to me to decide what you should and shouldn't say". I'm kind of curious, but would be disappointed if answering this question consumed your entire post to the exclusion of all other responses. Especially if you blamed me for it.
|
Below
EricHiggin said:
Final-Fan said:
Please don't ask me to watch videos whose titles are lies. I didn't see any laugh directed at Clinton.
As for what McConnell said, just because the Republicans take their cues nowadays from extremist bloggers, radio talk show hosts, etc., doesn't mean the Democrats are following suit. Let me know if someone in Congress proposes that, but until then McConnell—and you—are just stretching "a human being in the USA has this idea" to mean "the Democratic Party plans to do this". I mean, shit, if they were going to pack the court there wouldn't even be a need to impeach Kavanaugh.
|
TYT talking about it and FOX reporting it. They may do either or try both. McConnell smirks in the video which for him is about as close to a laugh as you get.
|
I wonder how many times I will have to re-post prior posts as proof of points in posts that have already have been made after the initial post?
Also don't be silly like me, we all know it's my fault. I can't remember why though, or when...
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.