By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
flashfire926 said:
EricHiggin said:

Well to say that PS fans are PS fans, but would rather play Fortnite on Switch doesn't jive. Let's put it this way to make it super simple. If the problem becomes big enough, like the close to 10 million people effected by this so you say, as of right now, and likely to grow, then you can bet that PS will make their own Switch like hardware to solve that problem. PS would much rather have you playing on a PS device, than allow you to give that money to other companies. The more games that end up having this problem, and the more gamers effected by it, the higher the chance you will see a new PS Portable sooner than later.

However, PS does not offer console gaming on the go right now, so if you choose what Nin is offering, which is gaming on the go, then you have to abide by Nin's rules on their platform, and PS's rules on theirs. Nin isn't going to allow Mario on PS consoles even if all 80 million PS gamers bought Switch's and said we want Mario wherever and whenever we want, with the best graphics available. That's not Nin's problem. If you want Mario, get a Nin device. Period. This could lead to another Nin home console though.

Epic has investors to answer to, but PS doesn't? Who's investors are more important? Should we all just say screw PS and their investors and let the company crash and burn? We all know what happens when there isn't enough competition in the industry. Should we force people who invest in PS to also invest just as much in Nin and MS to make sure everything is always even so there is no reason for any brand to try and up it's game?

Its Epic's fault because they chose not to look ahead and plan for the future, or they simply didn't care and took what they could get from PS. If you buy a set of rims for your car, and then decide you want a different brand of car, but want to keep your cool rims, yet find out that when you go to add them onto the new car that it has a different bolt pattern and they won't fit, you don't go and blame the car company. If you do they will tell you to either go back to your old brand of car or buy another set of rims and tires that fit their car. Why do the car companies do this? To make you spend more money and to try to lock you into their ecosystem. This happens in all industries, everywhere, all the time.

What a hypocritical post. Investors will rather have account switching allowed rather than swaths of bad PR at Sony's faces.

By the way, Sony stock was down 2% because of this. How ironic.  We can't screw up PS investors if PS already is doing that themselves.

And yes, we all know what happens when there isn't enough competition in the industry, which is stuff like this.

What an ill informed post. Clearly your not an investor. What they would prefer is a PS hardware device to solve the problem. One that not only solves this problem, but the many more that apparently are sure to arise just like this. Might as well have those 10 million+ Switch owners switching to a PS Portable spending their money on PS items, making it harder for other companies to compete, adding more profits for the PS brand and more value to the companies shares, and money in those investors pockets. Also better to wait it out until the hardware is ready to launch, instead of rushing broken hardware, or giving into cross platform game play sharing, where once that door is opened it can never be legitimately closed.

I mean why didn't XB just create a solely service based business back then if spending money up front to take business from other companies was such a horrible thing? Why is XB clearly spending a bunch of money now? A stock moving 2% is meaningless. It happens everyday across the market, up and down, and sometimes seemingly for no reason whatsoever.

What happens in a situation like this, is Nin creates something unique like the Switch, which apparently is good enough to buy for $299, but not good enough for the owners since they require a better graphical version on the $299 PS4. You also get things like Game Pass, which ends up useless for the most part because even though it's a really good deal, it's not making many people buy XB1's, so what's the point in PS bending over backwards if based on sales, people clearly agree PS is still pro consumer enough to warrant a PS4 purchase?



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.