By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
contestgamer said:
MasonADC said:

You seriously are not against that? There health is not as important as you getting the game? We can all wait as long as we need. 

This is a very small group of people in absolute terms that we're talking about. Few thousand. Millions play their games. Those millions are more important than the well being of a few thousand. Lets look at a 30 year stretch. We can have 10 Zelda games if they work them 50% more or we can have 6 if they dont. Nobody knows if theyre going to be alive 30 years from now - that's a 4 game swing that people might miss out on in their lives over just a 30 year stretch. These developers need to be maximized. 

Your math is severely off here.  The millions' health are not at stake.  Gotta put the value behind the numbers first, so if we had to compare the value of those millions' entertainment vs the thousands' livelihood....lets see...carry the 2, divide by the numerator, cancel out the denominator, raise the escalator, reach for the masturbator...yes I've got it.  The value of 1 of the millions' entertainment in this equation is approximately .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%  to 1 of the thousands' livelihood, and keep in mind there's  a decimal Googol margin of error.



Lube Me Up