By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
AlfredoTurkey said:

There's actually Japanese players on Splatoon 1 because it's not region locked and those guys don't fuck around so, overall, the players on the first game are definitely better.

And these "balanced and fixed" comments are bullshit (not you, but whoever says it is bullshitting). What they "balanced and fixed" was making the franchise more accessible and leveling the playing field. It's what Nintendo does. They release a game and then spend years tinkering with it until they find a formula where people of lesser or no skill can compete with people who are actually great... thus alienating the great players and forcing them to find something else to play.

When I play Splatoon 1, there is never a time where my experience and skill gets trumped by an in-game handicap. That is to say that every time I get taken down by another player, I feel like it was my fault. There is always a feeling of screwing up on my part. When I play Splatoon 2, on the other hand, it's almost constantly NOT my fault. The game was made that way. It's designed that way. And I just can't fucking take it. 

It's the same reason I just can't handle Mario Kart anymore. I can't handle games that handicap players of skill so as to allow lesser players to compete. It makes practicing and actually putting in effort pointless for me and drives me bat shit insane.

You haven't provided specific examples and evidence of how it's any more "not your fault" when you die in Splatoon 2 compared to 1.

It sounds to me like you got really good at the first game, and went into the sequel expecting to automatically be just as good without learning to master the tweaks to the formula. It's a very common occurrence with players of multiplayer franchises, it's happened with pretty much every new entry of COD since 2007, with people claiming with each new game that "COD is broken now". Doubtless when Smash on Switch launches it will be met with similar cries of how they killed Smash, it's unplayable now, etc.

Being good at one series entry doesn't guarantee you'll be just as good at subsequent entries without being adaptable.

I don't want to get into specifics because then I'll spend days of my life arguing with people who feel the need to justify their purchases as if their life depends on it. But I DO have a list, and it's very valid. I know what I'm talking about here. The things they removed and the things they added were all done to aid worse players and level the playing field.