PortisheadBiscuit said:
Budget conscious gamers would no doubt spend $300 for a lower budget handheld, several games etc than $300 for a standalone Switch with $60 games. If you type in google "why is Nintendo.." the most searched term is "why is Nintendo Switch so expensive". At this juncture, Switch is still a premium system in consumer's eyes. Id imagine parents of 5-12 year olds are reluctant at this point. A budget system would fill that gap.
True, though I believe there's a market for the $99-129 range as well. The 2DS/2DS XL series has done well and is what is currently pushing sales of the aging system.
Let's also not forget marketshare, why settle for 30% when you can have 40-45%. That always looks sweet to investors.
Keep in mind, all this is hypothetical as well as wishful thinking because I love Nintendo handhelds. While I love my Switch, it feels more like a home system than handheld and doesnt completely fill my handheld void. |
The 3DS didnt have a the 2DS system until 3 years on the market though.
The Switch isnt even a year old. In time for Pokemon im sure we will see a handheld only revision at $179-200.
Remove the hd rumble, reduce the screen size, drop the dock, no joycons as seperate components wh ere manufacturing and contents are concered (gyro etc)...
I dont think the system needs to hit the $120 pricetag whilst its still in its peak. This is all relative as well, the Switch is doing at $300 what the 3DS couldnt do at $170 and what the Wii couldnt do at $250.A budget revision will come but not now (thats the 3DS) and not at the expense of their unified developement pipelime.







