| Kerotan said: Funny you say I'm taking nonsense. Not only is that insulting to me but it's also insulting to many others who also believe Switch to be a 3DS successor. Read over on gaf and their main Nintendo sales guy (Chris1964) has regularly explained how Nintendo's primary developers have moved focus to the Switch. Actually if you have an account post on the gaf thread and ask if the Switch is a 3DS successor or not. They'll explain very well to you why it is. For a console to get support when their new generation has arrived is nothing new. Sure look at ps2 and ps3. Now whether Nintendo intended to have a seperate handheld only succesor or not, they probably changed their mind after seeing the success of the switch. Edit: succesor would be my preferred term to use instead of replace. because replace suggests the other console just ends but we've seen with many successors in the past (Switch, vita, PS3, ps4, XB1) that the consoles they are succeeding don't actually get replaced for a few years after launch. |
I don't care if you find it insulting and I don't care about whoever else is saying it on here or on GAF, because it's nonsense. It's foolish. It's nonsense until someone high up at Nintendo directly states that the Switch is replacing or is the successor to the 3DS. When you have both Reggie Fils-Aime and Tatsumi Kimishima directly saying you're wrong on a Nintendo product, it's time to pack up your nonsense and admit that you're wrong.
If not, don't be surprised to see people mocking you and laughing at you.
