| zorg1000 said: nope, completely different scenarios. Mine is actually based on something, statements & actions by Nintendo themselves while yours is just a pipedream. Sony themselves said that they dont there being a market for a Vita successor and there is literally no reason to believe MS is all of a sudden going to make a portable gaming device. no, Nintendo never said that, i think you are getting confused with them saying a unified platform could potentially offer various form factors that act as "brothers". Sure some think its too expensive or too big for portability, thats why price cuts and revisions exist. The rest of that paragraph is just random nonsense especially the bolded. Who said anything about being the best? I said people bought 3DS for games like Pokemon, Mario Kart, Smash Bros, Monster Hunter, Animal Crossing, 2D/3D Mario, Zelda, Yokai Watch, Dragon Quest, etc. and as long as these games appear on Switch than the likelihood of the 3DS audience moving over to Switch is very high. |
I watched a hilarious comedy the other day by Dave Chappelle called "The Age of Spin". Your own version here is much more in depth, and much less funny...
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
