By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Acevil said:

I felt satisfied by Conquest, I do not want to replay it to see the middle path is my reasoning. It is like ask me to replay a game for just for neutral ending of said game. Given I might want Revelations later in the year, if I feel an real itch to play something tactical to bind me to the next main fire emblem game. 


Also I won't be getting the $20 Zelda expansion until after winter when i do know what it is. 

What are you even talking about? Revelation is not Conquest with a different ending slapped on it.

Fire Emblem Fates' first five chapters are always the same, then the game branches off in three paths of 22 chapters that either feature different maps or rearranged familiar maps (different starting points, enemy formations, objectives). The optional maps to recruit the children are the same across all three campaigns, but not all of the optional maps are available in each; Revelation is the only campaign that has them all. €20 isn't a bad price for a full Fire Emblem campaign; yes, there are reused parts, but you are also only paying half of the normal price, so there's no overcharging here.

I don't necessarily have the biggest issue over price by the way, Just so we are clear. I just do not really want to revisit the world, and to me nothing truthfully is offered that I felt like I should revisit this world either if that makes sense. To me conquest was enough of that world. Given we are getting a bit off topic, if you want to scold me, you can on my wall.