DonFerrari said:
Puppyroach said:
If taxpayer money goes into public research for example, of course the results should be shared with the masses, for examples in cases of environmental research, infrastructure research and so on. This is the attempt by an administration to control information that belongs to the public. I'm not talking about employees having the right to bash the government, but rather their obligation to share public information.
Regarding your second part: generally, government entities are more complex and ineffective than private counterparts (with some exceptions, the private health care and insurance system in the US seems like the most ineffective system I've ever seen). The reason they are less effective is because their job is to work for the people, not s small group of private shareholders. Yes, it would likely be more effective to run a country like a company, but that's because a company is not a democracy, it is rather more like a dictatorship where you can also increase your power by owning more of the vote. That works for a company but is the opposite to a democracy.
|
So you are confusing research boycote/censorship with social media use to divulgue it? Yep, not a overreach.
Nope, they are more inefficent because public servers don't hold themselves to a commitment to be profitable, so they accept a lot of pratices that no sane company would.
And democracy in several ways can be seem as the dictatorship of the majority, and that majority very often may be very wrong. At the time Einstein made his discoveries probably 99,99999999% of people would say he was wrong and in a democracy he would have been overuled.
|
Of course they should be able to announce findings via social media.
And it should be a given that public departments shouldn't aim to make a profit but rather use the taxpayer money in such a way that cost are kept low putting a lesser demand on taxes.
And no, a democracy can never be a dictatorship since they are each others opposites. Oppression can occur by the masses towards minorities but that has nothing to do with dictatorship. You must separate forms of governing with structures in society.
