By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
KungKras said:

If it was the right decision to give the WIi the specs that it had is a separate discussion. But the Wii hardware did allow for the CoD experience. Goldeneye Wii had all the relevant features, the split screen multiplayer and everything. Hell, Perfect Dark did had all the relevant features too, on the N64. There was nothing that was impossible to do on the Wii except the HD graphics.

Having 1/6th the RAM, 1/10th the polygon draw power, 1/10th the compute power for physics makes a difference bro. 

The COD games on the Wii *were* pretty decent, so what exactly are you complaining about? They got good reviews, Activision put a good amount of effort into them. People are not stupid though the guy who wants COD was not going to buy the (by comparison) Wii version. 

GoldenEye on the Wii didn't exactly break sales records either. 

You're not addressing my point. You said that power was why features were missing in CoD Wii. That's demonstrably not true. I don't care how much weaker the Wii was than the HD twins. Every missing feature had already been done on hardware as old as the N64.

I wasnt talking about sales when I mentioned goldeneye. I mentioned it because it had all the features that the Wii CoD games should have had. Thus hardware limitations wasn't the issue.

EDIT: And Goldeneye sold respectably.



I LOVE ICELAND!