By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lawlight said:
Acevil said:

No where did Disney themselves say it was a failure. People jumped on Kevin Feige seizing all the power and phasing out some executives is not enough evidence for that. I know very much what you are referencing. It was brilliant power play all it was. 

However you still have not answered me, what is your view on Batman V Superman, something that has similar budget to Captain America: Civil War. Since by your own very logic that Disney deemed it a failure, what does that make Batman V Superman, whose whole division was shaked up worse than Marvel shake up. 

I really liked BvS. I don't think WB was expecting Avengers type of money with a new Batman and only the 2nd movie in the DCCU. Sure, it underperformed but once WB gets on the good side of reviewers, it'll be fine. On the other hand, Disney must be concerned with the diminishing returns of their Avengers movies.

I don't think they are worried to be honest, you can worry for them, seeing how this year looks like their biggest year yet, they already were the quickest to 1 billion domestically. Also Disney capitalizes better than any other company with Merchandise and Amusement, something only Universal seems to be capable rival for. So pretty sure financially they are not worried about their wonderful investment of Marvel. 

Warner Brother did the first wise thing with the franchise and get rid of Zack Synder vision which will help them along. However they have yet to fill the void left by Nolan Batman and Harry Potter, so they do have to be more concerned than DC at the moment. Also so you are telling me they did not expect to beat Batman movies? 

Again with your own very logic, if Batman V Superman was not going to rival MCU's Avengers, but some how Captain America is, just explain that to me.