By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Aeolus451 said:

So SE forced nintendo into censoring an artbook? oh Yeah.... That makes lots of sense. *rolls eyes

If SE chose not to port something because they didn't think the game would sell well enough then that's fine. It's their choice. It's not worth it for them. What does that have to do with nintendo making the choice to censor an artbook? Nothing and doesn't excuse it however you try to dice it.

Perhaps you should just put the shield down and understand that many people don't like censorship at all. Nintendo is starting to make a habit of censorship and it's getting noticed. 

You are funny.

If Square-Enix doesn't localize sequels to games that sold well, then that's fine because it's their choice.
If Nintendo changes a few little things, then it's not fine, even though it is their choice.

You seriously have more respect for Square-Enix for withholding games from a worldwide audience than for Nintendo who makes games available to a worldwide audience.

Because they are not obligated to port every game released in japan. It makes perfect sense to only port games that are likely to sell well overseas. If gamers were gonna hold fault to any japanese gaming company for not porting a game then everyone of them would be guilty. It's ridiculous to hold any fault for not porting a game. Nintendo is porting games they think will do well overseas but they should just leave the game content alone except to translate or add in voices. They're trying too hard to be a kid's company. They should respect the consumer's choice if they want to play a game with whatever kind of content. One size doesn't fit everyone.