RolStoppable said:
Square-Enix's refusal is the root cause. If they had published the game in the West, Nintendo wouldn't have had to step in in the first place and then the "outrageous" censorship of three pages in an artbook wouldn't have happened either. Heck, if Square-Enix had published the game, then there would have probably been no artbook for the West to begin with. I am giving people who care about gaming justice a fair chance to consider the entirety of this topic. You and others can choose to ignore Square-Enix, but it says a lot about yourselves. |
So SE forced nintendo into censoring an artbook? oh Yeah.... That makes lots of sense. *rolls eyes
If SE chose not to port something because they didn't think the game would sell well enough then that's fine. It's their choice. It's not worth it for them. What does that have to do with nintendo making the choice to censor an artbook? Nothing and doesn't excuse it however you try to dice it.
Perhaps you should just put the shield down and understand that many people don't like censorship at all. Nintendo is starting to make a habit of censorship and it's getting noticed.








