By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cobretti2 said:
what was so bad about the prequels? i hear lots of people say it but never justify it lol.


Even from a point of view of being movies on their own and not about how poor their angsty cgi ridden mess of story was. The prequels actually revealed some things which were not needed which would prevent the movies being watched 1-6, not only the obvious fact that Vader has a child and he was Anakin skywalker, but they show the fact that he had twins and the other is Leia.

while obviously the Vader = Lukes father spoiler is known by people who've not seen Star Wars (Vader being dutch word for Father lol), the being twins with Leia was pointless to add in the prequels.

Also Jar Jar Binks

Also whiney Anakin politics for hours

Also the Jedi high council who rule everything in the whole universe in the first movie while there is 1 sith person that lives on a rock who has zero power.... but the Jedi council want to find Anakin because he will bring balance.... like... it would be like an army of 50billion soldiers against 1 wanting to add something to the equation which made the fight more balanced, shit writing or the Jedi had no idea they rules all?

Also Jar Jar Binks

General Grevious only getting to appear in a prequel movie just after leaving the final scene of the Genndy Tartakovsky Star Wars Clone wars animated series in which he was an amazing Jedi killing villain... but had his chest crushed in the final scene meaning that in the movies he was a coughing loser who got shot to death with a blaster.... a blaster : < the guy had a collection of lightsabers as a belt which he had removed from Jedi he was wiping out in the animated series.

Also



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive