Kagerow said:
JRPGfan said:
Miyamoto talkin BS.
"We're always thinking, is there a middle ground where people who do enjoy the 3D worlds of Galaxy and those who enjoy New Super Mario Bros. can both enjoy it?"
"The recent Super Mario 3D Land for 3DS and 3D World for Wii U are examples of this middle ground."
NO they are NOT good exsamples of a middle ground.
Besides people ARNT asking for a half & half type galaxy game.
Why is it so f***ing hard to just listen to what your comsumers want, and give it to them?
They want a real Galaxy 3 game, just make one. Please.
This is metroid / animal crossing all over again.
Nintendo when you strike gold, you just keep mineing that gold vein.
You dont go trying to reinventing the wheel, all the facking time for no reason.
Wrong mentality.
its "how could it possbily go wrong if they did a 3rd", the answear is it cant.
They dont need to improve it, its close to perfect, they just need new levels/area's in better graphics and thats it.
|
Actually, very good example of middle ground, and very good example of listening to what their actual consumer wants.
People really need to face the fact that they are not returning to 64 formula because nobody outside of gaming forum wants them anymore.
Amazing games, yes. But you expect them to sell in the world where people need to look up the guide for the Portal? Super Mario can't appeal to 'Dark Souls' audience on Nintendo console. Not only that 'Dark Souls' audience is on PS4, but it didn't even carried bloodborne into multi-million.
Until Nintendo finds a magical way to make everyone capable enough to actually go practice or think about it a bit before quitting, they will have to stay in the middle ground.
|
How can you get lost in 64? I could definitely understand Sunshine, but Mario 64?
