What kind of Marvel approach you like better: Avengers' Marvel or Daredevil's Marvel?

[Goddbless]

The Fury said:

TheSting said:
I remember when they announced that Civil War and I ran out and got the comic book. I was thinking this SH vs SH shit sounds interesting. It started very good with the guy blowing up a town. Penance I think. May be wrong it's been a few years. Punisher shows up and kills someone and Cap beats the shit out of him. It started out great action wise then got stale. Storyline overall was great.
I don't know about the Civil War movie though. A lot won't be in it. & they keep making these movies rated PG 13 when they need to be Rated R.

Ignore the actual Civil War plot. Age of Ultron was not about Sue Storm and Wolverine going through time to stop Ultron ever existing. This won't be Civil War. for one there are like 5 superheroes in stead of hundreds, no Reed to be on Tony's side, no New Warriors to make a mistake, no mutants to say 'We've done registration for the sole reason of existing and you think registering to do superhero antics matter when our population just went from 16 million to less than 200 in a moment?'.... so just a few missing things.

If not for all the different companies owning different heroes Marvel would be able to make movies closer to the comics. I think they do a good job with what they have though. I think X-Men would be way better if it were part of the MCU instead of Fox's test subject.