Why Starfox Zero's graphics are bad

[burninmylight]

Einsam_Delphin said:

burninmylight said:

No, there is proof: every other Nintendo game ever. History tells me that Nintendo wouldn't fart out a game that has such a drastic difference in quality of production between different levels of the same game.

Also, I always hate it when  people use the retarded "There's zero proof that __ is  happening, therefore it can't be true" logic. Do you have proof that it won't be? No, you don't? Then it makes plenty of sense to assume what we saw isn't all that we'll get. Again, see Super Mario 3D World E3 2013 reveal as an example.

That's not my logic, I never said there's no chance of an upgrade, only that it makes more sense to take what is physicallly there as true instead of what you hope will be there.

3D World didn't change from E3 to release, nor has any recent game revealed so close to launch that I can recall.

What's physically there are other games. That's my proof. Pikmin 3 began as a Wii project, like this latest Star Fox. I've never heard anyone say the portions of the game that were originally produced on Wii are like night and day compared to the portions built from the ground up for Wii U. You and torok can try and bill me as crazy all you want, but my proof is not in "They wouldn't show us anyting other than the final game!" or "There's no proof." My proof is in Nintendo's track record with every other game.

For all we know, the Corneria level in that DE trailer could have been the exact same build that was only shown to a select few journalists at last year's E3. You're telling me that I shouldn't make assumptions when I have yet to see anyone offer me anything more than their own baseless assumptions as well.