By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ouroboros24 said:
Zappykins said:
But it gives you like a 4 hour movie and they get to make more money.

Plus, those two movies are more the whole book than most of the other book/movies of Harry Potter. They in effect made that book like a 4 hour movie and cut less out than usual.

Plus, the second movie is really different for a Hatty Potter, but I think also really good.

It's debatable to state whether the movies were more quantity over quality, but that's not the point here.  If you've ever watch Lawrence of Arabia, it's about 227 minutes long, that's about 4 hours long.  Imagine right where the halftime of the movie is about to hit, it ends.  Wait a year and pay another price for admittance and you'll see the rest.  It's just a bad practice on a movie.  It's more or less essentially a DLC for movies. 

OMG, that's may just be the trend in the near future.  Sure, it's big titles like Harry Potter and the Avengers, but then if it does become more profitiable, little movies like 'Spy' might just start doing it.  No Lord, please I don't want to live in a world of movie DLCs.

It think it really depends on the movie.  There are some movies that are 90 minutes long, and I think they are too long.  Other, I'm happy to watch the 4 hour one like the extended Lord of the Rings movies.

But yet, ending in the action is annoying.  Did you see the 2nd hobbit one?



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!