noname2200 said:
Would it help if you viewed the punishment as being not for underinflating a football, but repeatedly refusing to cooperate with, and apparently lying to, the investigation? |
You first have to prove something happened before proving there was a coverup. As for Brady not sharing his emails, I think a fine would be a good penalty for that, however I would also like to see any text in the rulebook which talks about disclosure. I also see how it is entirely reasonable for Brady to refuse for a number of privacy reasons. The NFL already looked through the staffers phone, so it isn't like there is some missing link in the conversation that could only be retrieved from Brady's phone.
While I can understand a suspension for a few games (4 is overkill) to some degree, I think that the penalties on the organization are ridiculous. To my knowledge, no evidence was found linking Belichick or Kraft (or anyone of any importance other than Brady) so penalizing the club to such a large degree seems like too much.
For what many (including many current and past players) see as no big deal (and something that was treated as no big deal by the NFL prior to this case) to carry such a heavy penalty makes the NFL look like a joke.
FatedReality said:
|
The Colts balls that the Colts used on offense also showed values below the legal limit according to the Wells report.







