| Euphoria14 said: I dont care if people are trying to make jokes. Point is that people aren't suddenly contesting the score, but rather embracing it, so your point is moot. I read it as "If pokemon had less water, it would have gotten higher than 7.8. If Smash had tons of water it would have scored less than 9.8." They are jokes, nothing more, and terrible ones at that. This is the same outlet that was claimed to have a bias last gen, yet named Galaxy as game of the generation. And when that happened, guess what, it wasn't contested.
When the score isn't what they like, they bitch and moan. When the score is what they like, they don't contest it like they do the scores they don't like.
I've been around long enough. I've seen how it works. Great score either way and deserved. Played it myself, but if it's a spade, i'll call it a spade. |
Why would I complain about the things they get right? I personally have no real qualms with the Pokemon score, but I don't see any logic in discounting everything someone does just because you disagree with a specific thing (or a few specific things)...it isn't a black and white issue (its an ORAS issue...sorry, bad pun). I will complain about the specific instances in which a site produces something that I find to be bullshit, but why would I complain about the things they produce that aren't bullshit? This review is well written and fairly comprehensive, with a score that matches the critiques and the critiques and praise being logical and well elucidated... why should I complain?
I genuinely do not understand what your problem is here...
