| o_O.Q said: a. well ultimately i guess it comes down to which engineers you choose to believe and i can already point out lies in the report the main premise with this report is that "Witnesses did not report hearing such a loud noise, nor is one audible on recordings of the collapse" and therefore no explosions occured, however, the video i posted for you does show people who reported hearing loud explosions if they are willing to lie about that why would you trust the report?
even you can look with your own eyes and see that the collapse is anomalous and comparable to controlled events all of these videos are around 2 minutes long https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nco5hmi3OmU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qyYZe-R3p4
and what do they report as the cause of the collapse?
d. "There needs to be a logical continuance between the evidence" yes i agree but ultimately evidence is not enough for some people some people have to hear information from their authority figures in other to consider it as being true this even extends to events that they experience themselves you did the same thing yourself assuming that you watched the video i posted because if you did you would have seen numerous people talking about hearing explosions or seeing their effects on 911 yet because an authority figure told you that you are mistaken you overrided what you experienced and chose to be controlled by the authority figure if you did not actually watch the video i retract what i said and apologise i'm quite sure that had CNN come out tomorrow and told everyone that indeed it was done by the governemnt most people would be swayed even if they weren't provided with adequate evidence to corroborate the claim |
a. They were talking about people outside the building, not the to be expected noises inside the building. Like they said, the smallest explosive capable of doing that sort of damage would be heard easily within a very large radius. That didn't happen. Obviously there would be loud noises in the process of a building collapsing, but there is a distinct difference between those and the sound of a heavy explosive detonating.
Additionally, there was a lot more to the report stating that fires do explain the collapse of the building. As I said, NIST is a pretty big deal in the sciences, and with each of these points you make, you are just adding more moving parts. If NIST is "lying" that would mean that every one of the researchers as well as the people above them would have to have been in on this as well...
The building's collapse was explained in detail by NIST, and explained by the unique method of support that was used in the building (explaining why one side collapsed first). I don't see why it is so difficult to believe that a building that had come under heavy damage from debris and was on fire would fall down, especially after the cause has been verified by prestigious scientific organizations.
d. As I said before, there were obviously a lot of loud noises and confusion occuring at the time these buildings collapsed, but if Building 7 was taken down by explosives, it would be indisputable. Additionally, it makes no logical sense to blow up Building 7 and then brush it under the rug when the damage was obviously already done.
Here is another section of the NIST report:
For the building to have been prepared for intentional demolition, walls and/or column enclosures and fireproofing would have to be removed and replaced without being detected. Preparing a column includes steps such as cutting sections with torches, which produces noxious and odorous fumes. Intentional demolition usually requires applying explosive charges to most, if not all, interior columns, not just one or a limited set of columns in a building.
17. An emergency responder caught in WTC 7 between the 6th and 8th floors said he heard two loud booms. Isn't that evidence that there was an explosion?
The sound levels reported by all witnesses do not match the sound level of an explosion that would have been required to cause the collapse of the building.
