By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sundin13 on 06 October 2014
Edit Thread
JazzB1987 said:

I like his fusion more. Because a portable fusion will be unnecessary expensive. 

If I just want it to be "on the go" i still have to pay for a HDMI connector and bluetooth for 4 controller support etc etc.  Also it will limit the Fusions horsepower since its portable.

And if I just want the thing to be a console I would have to pay for a probably 5" HD touchscreen  buttons slide pads battery etc.

Having 2 seperate systems one for your TV and a portable one gives you the choice.

And btw having 2 systems that run games in e.g 720p medium and the other at 1080 ultra  does not in any way kill the portable at all.  There is just 2 devices isntead of one. The portable probably has no option to add 3 bluetooth controllers etc.

My Fusion is more of a "Nintendo should look into this option when technology allows it"...it may not be feasable in 2-3 years when Nintendo chooses to release their next console(s) but if it is, I think it would be great. Its like an ideal that Nintendo should strive towards as soon as possible...

Honestly, I think the idea of having two separate systems that play the same games is ridiculously stupid, but thats just me.