eva01beserk said:
I know it was an unlikely senario. I meant that its to far from what I'm trying to say and your painted a picture that its only perfect if the acusaton is wrong unlike whats actally hapening. I get what you are saying and I belive your right, and the method discused is right and that it is overtracked. But like you say yourself, no body can know the actual number and its just a guess. But even if it does not make sence, cuz is highly unlikely that it can happen this way its not really impossible. Ass long as is not imposible and you have no real clue as to where is overtracked you cant really say that it definetly is. Its like wining the loto, its unlikely to happe, but it hapes so you cant just rule out that possibility. A question I responded to seece in this thread is that what if the sold was higher then the shipped? And that was senario where there would be no debate cuz the there can only be one answer and it was imposible to be that way. But this is not the case. Its unlikely that the wii u had 20k in shelves WW, but not imposible. @bold: So thats basicly your answer to my previous question? So if you dont like the numbers you can take out a ramdom amount of the unespecify area? What happened to the thread ioi made when people where complaining about the ps4 10m thing? He said it dosent work like that and needs to know where he has made the mistake before adjusting the numbers and this is also the same thing. If this thing was done at random then this whole site has no validity. |
and yet he adjusted them recently without any new information...
I say it again. Those regions that aren't Japan, US, most of Europe and perhaps South Korea are nothing more than better guesses.
We know WiiU sales data in Japan, US, and most of Europe (the important European countries). What's left is Asia (-Japan), South America and Africa.
On VGC that's the Others region. So adjusting numbers to fit NPD, GFK, Famitsu etc. and then removing the rest from the Others region would be the logical thing to do.
Basically you say that we should keep the unlikely guesstimates of those regions instead of replacing them with more logical guesstimates.
How's that making the numbers any more realistic?







