goulibouli said:
Yes but what happened?
1. Irak has a classic Middle-East History. While it was a secular and peaceful independent land, under the Ottoman Empire for centuries, it all suddenly stopped after WWI, when Britain took mandated control over its land.
2. After it got decolonized, the country was left in instability and many conflicts arose; this is a classic situation of neo-colonization, like in Africa: when Britain colonialist armies left, they left the ingredient for corruption and instability that they nourished frequently by arming and financing oppositions.
3. Fortunately but shortly, inspired by the panarabic movement of Nasser, Irak became a stable, secular and modernized country for a while.
4. Then during the cold war, the US, in order to attack and destabilize Iran, financed and armed Saddam Hussein. While there was numerous conflict, leading to several conflicts, the US have taken Britain's neo-colonizing role.
5. As for most "dictators" financed and armed by western countries, such as Irak, Pakistan, Lybia, Egypt, Syria...the somewhat stable, secular and independant countries, were at first attacked under false pretenses, like they use to do in the 20th century but a new, more insidious form of colonialism 3.0 emerged in the 21th century: colored revolution and false-flag terrorist cells.
6. Today after destroying and stealing ressources from Irak, which went from a stable, independent, secular country into a hell-hole, now that the US/UK armies left, these same western countries financed and armed newly created terrorists cell like ISIS, who have for orders not to attack American companies and building which are still exploiting Irak, nor help Palestinians, but to plunge the country into an extremist, unstable chaos, and go help their colleagues in Syria, an other stable, secular but independant country that was suddenly attacked by hordes of islamists financed by US/UK/France etc...
Now if you don't know shit about History and Geopolitic like most of you seem to, please don't open it.
|
