By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Areym said:
noname2200 said:
Areym said:
Live > Recorded. There is more potential for screw ups but it just feels more alive and you get a quick check of people's reaction. Are they amazed? are they dissapointed? Are they indifferent?


Are a couple of bloggers' opinions important in forming my own? Am I acknowledging that my own reactions are irrelevant? Am I a man or a lemming? These are the questions that need answers!!!

Ok, i'm just gonna back away slowly now...

I didn't mean it will change my opinion on things, nor did I imply that. I just think that seeing the audience interaction about announcements can be pretty important or if anything, just make it more lively. Like when people Boo'd the vita 3g being on contract with AT&T only or those quick jabs at the Xbox one DRM scandals from Sony (Supporting used games, etc) It adds a bit of live into the show. 

Meh. The press (who make up the audiences at the conferences) will not be shy about letting you know how they feel, if anyone's interested. More importantly, if a conference designed to be just as much circus as informative requires an audience reaction to make it lively, well, can there be a better argument for why replacing them with something better isn't a bad idea?