By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
burninmylight on 31 December 2013
Edit Thread
spemanig said:
burninmylight said:
spemanig said:
burninmylight said:

I'm not sure how Game Freak/The Pokemon Company would feel about that.

 


Gamefreak isn't even close to the only developer to touch a Pokemon game. They wouldn't feel anything.

Then why haven't we seen a real Pokemon RPG on a console? I know there are Pokemon games made by other studios, but how many of them aren't spin-offs?

http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/631516-wii-u/67111173


The game I'm talking about by definition WOULD be a spin-off. Every game that isn't part of the main series is, by definition, a spin-off. No one's debating that. And Pokemon Colleseum and XD: Gale of Darkness are both catagorically "real Pokemon RPGs."

Also, I don't know what that link is supposed to prove. Gamefreak does not own Pokemon; Nintendo does. If Nintendo wanted to, they could fire Gamefreak and get literally anyone they want to continue the main series. Gamefreak created the IP, but Nintendo owns it.

Why would Nintendo want to though? And why would Nintendo ruin its relationship with GF by handing over GF's baby to another studio?

I just realized that arguing this is a moot point because this whole thread begins with "What if?", therefore it's not meant to about whether it would happen. Therefore, I apologize for missing the point.

Now that I have my focus calibrated, I couldn't help but notice you said "real-time action setting" in the OP. I wonder how a roselia would look taking on an onyx.