| biglittlesps said: They made business move but they betrayed Sony by not giving a PS vita version even though game made debut on PSP. I'm sure Nintendo will lose Money on Wii U for doing this and also trying milk ips so much for earning money than trying to innovate with new IP's and also not reducing games price for very long time. So, this proves they only care about Money than providing value for Gamers. Sony try to support New IP's with risk wher Nintendo tries to make sure esatblished IP's to sell and earn profit more(Ex;- MH, Sonic etc.,) |
How did Capcom betray Sony? It's not like they had an exclusivity deal or anything. MH3 debuted on the Wii! Even the series in general wasn't of PSP origins, releasing for the PS2 back in 2004.
Are you hoping Nintendo loses money for having a successful 3rd party deal? And not reducing the price of valuable games over a period of time proves that Nintendo knows how economics work, not that they are evil.
As for Nintendo's lack of new IP's... please look at the best selling games of all time. #1 is a new IP from Nintendo. Six of the top 10 are new IP's from Nintendo. If and just missing out on the list are games like Wii Fit and Nintendogs, which were new series.
In contrast, let's look at the best selling SCE games of all time. The top six games are Gran Turismos and the seventh Final Fantasy, beyond that, you have Crash Bandicoot 2 and 3 and Tekken 3 in the Top 10. So the Sony Top 10 games of all time include a grand total of ONE new IP.
But hey! Let's just assume that Nintendo moneyhats popular existing series, even though this is very out of character for a company that can't be arsed to pay for development of games! That makes sense!
