| Kaizar said:
Basically less then 1/12 of those movies where in 3D with a cheaper 2D alternative version to pay for, but somehow the 3D movie screenings of movies that make up less then 10% of all movies made up 40% to 60% of profits in theaters when they only charge $1 to $3 more then a 2D movie screening cost. So nice way to doge reality like your source did. Posting your source for more people to crunch the numbers that all your links intentionally ignore: http://www.theloop.ca/showbiz/movies/news/article/-/a/2230761/3D-movies-are-cooler-in-China
So clearly in 2013, more then 70% of Americans right now, currently like 3D movies. |
$1-$3 more?? I don't know what theaters you are referring to. But, the AMC theaters in my area charge $10.25 for 2D, $16 for 3D, and $18 for IMAX 3D. That's more of $6-$8 difference. When you start multiplying that out, of course they are going to account for higher dollar amounts despite being only a small percentage of overall ticket sales!
