SvennoJ said:
Kaizar said:
Guellermo Del Toro has been recording Pinocchio in 3D since before he started recording Pacific Rim. Guillermo Del Toro spent so much time getting into detail of how he wanted the 3D effect done in each scene, which shows major passion for 3D, despite his earlier views.
J.J. Abrams promise he would record all future Star Trek movies in 3D.
I could find Martin Scorsese's earlier views on 3D which shows he has no interest in ever making a 3D movie, but even his views change and he is now happy that he made a 3D movie.
PI know of Christopher Nolan's earlier views on 3D explaining why he didn't shot the Dark Knight Rises in 3D. But he was the Producer of Man of Steel and he could have made that a 2D only movie if he still believed in his views back then, but instead he made the theater format of the 3D effect 19 lambarts (which is why I made sure to see the IMAX 3D version, because I was sure he was going to do such a thing from his past statement about batman 3 not being in 3D).
Neil Blomkamp clearly hates both HD & IMAX the most, and sees them as a much more bigger gimmick. The Neil Blomkamp statement basically confirms what I have always been saying, which is that HD & IMAX are a way more bigger gimmick then 3D will ever be.
At the end of the day, 2D is going the way of "Black & White" in everyway.
Can we all just agree that HD & IMAX will always be a more bigger gimmick then 3D has ever been?
And that 24 fps is the coolest frame rate for live-action movies, even though 48 fps is needed for certain action scenes in live-action 3D movies?
|
At least get your facts straight. Christopher Nolan is one of 5 writers for Man of Steel, he left the project to pursue his own movies after he could not agree with the ending.
Guillermo Del Torro's complaint is that 3D makes things look smaller, he is ok with co-directing a stop motion version of Pinocchio in 3D as the whole point of stop motion is looking at a miniature. As far as I can tell he's obsessed with the look of the characters, not the 3D process.
I don't know about Abrams promiss to go 3D, but I imagine if the studio is pushing it on him he'll want to have a say in it anyway.
HD and Imax or not a bigger gimmick, heck don't you youself keep saying that you have to go to IMAX to enjoy 3D?
Or are you being sarcastic now, I can't tell.
48/60 fps has a future too, for certain styles or action scenes if they fix the scene lighting. That will take some time to figure out as everything has been developed to make 24fps look good. However 3D already exists since 1922, and still no solution for the focus/convergence problem. And glasses free 3D cinema also seems to be impossible for a long time to come.
At the end of the day 3D is going the way of shaky cam. It will be there as a film style, it won't replace 2D. The balance is only skewed at the moment due to the higher ticket prices.
|
Christopher Nolan is both writer & producer of Man of Steel. Story by Christopher Nolan & David S. Goyer, and the Producer is Christopher Nolan and the woman who was producer for the batman trilogy.
Gillermo Del Toro use to complain about 3D making things smaller from his personal experience with what he had seen. But if you see Pacific Rim in 3D you will see it makes the screen look soo much more bigger. So his own 3D movie this July 12 2013 contradicts his own statement. Plus my experience of 3D is that it makes that screen waaay bigger like: Castlevania Lords of Shadow Mirror of Fate & Lego City Undercover the chase begins & Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D. And the 3D effect keeps making the screen look even way more bigger every 6 to 8 months with more newer games always having more EXTREMELY insane 3D, which is just awesome.
Everyone who sees Pacific Rim 3D & Luigi's Mansion Dark moon & Castlevania mirror of fate & Lego City Undercover Prequel & Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D agrees.
Neil Blomkamp said HD & IMAX always adds less to a movie then 3D.
And in the past not that many comas supported stereoscopic movies, until 2011 when we went from a minority of theaters being capable of showing stereoscopic movies to now having most to all of today's American cinemas now capable of displaying stereoscopic movies since they now have the equipment to do it at all. Plus 3D TVs never became mainstream like color TVs until recently.
And a lot of people only hate 3D for having to wear 3D glasses, but with glasses free 3D 4K HD TVs from such companies as Toshiba where 9 different people can move across the room all the time and still see the 3D 24/7, there's gonna be less reason for a good percentage of 3D haters to hate 3D because a good portion of them only hate the needing to wear glasses for 3D outside of cinemas part.
And I only said to watch IMAX for a few 3D movies, namely Iron Man 3 & Man of Steel & Hobbit 2 during 2013. But almost all 3D movies are just fine on the regular size screen for the theater format of the 3D effect.
